Nathan Freystaetter
Founder & CEO
- Sr Data Scientist & Strategy Lead, Square
- Strategy & Analytics Manager, Oportun
- Senior Business Analyst, Capital One Auto Finance
I spent over a decade building the data systems behind decisions at Square, Capital One, and Oportun. Places where the infrastructure was world-class. Models in production, pipelines that ran overnight, numbers you could act on the moment you saw them. Data just worked.
In 2019, I moved to Greenville, South Carolina, and spent a year talking to finance leaders at the companies here: manufacturing plants, PE portfolio companies, logistics firms. Every one of them told me the same thing. A dozen systems that did not talk to each other. Half the week spent gathering and reconciling instead of deciding. An ERP that cost millions and still needed a spreadsheet taped to the side of it.
It took me longer than it should have to see what I was actually looking at. There was no missing tool in those companies. There was a person doing the integration by hand, every month, because nothing else was going to. The data existed. Nothing was holding it together.
That is not a finance finding. Finance is just where I happened to look. It is what happens to any company that bought software faster than it connected it, and it is why so much AI lands with nothing underneath it. Most companies do not have an AI problem. They have a data problem wearing an AI costume, and no amount of tooling fixes it from the outside.
So Go Fig does one thing well: capture what a business already generates, then put agents on top of it that do real work. Every engagement is senior-led and built for the company it runs in. None of them are a product you configure yourself.